Correlation Data for SEO and Social Media Analysis - Part 2 - Whiteboard Friday

[fivefilters.org: unable to retrieve full-text content]

Posted by Aaron Wheeler

 Last week, Rand discussed the importance of correlation data in general and how you can use it for SEO research. It's a lot easier to get things done if you know which tasks are high priority and which are low, and correlation data can help. This week, Rand finishes off this two-part series on correlation data by discussing some specific observations we've made about correlations between SEO tactics and their effects on rankings. There are some very interesting conclusions, so check it out! Also let us know in the comments below if you've been able to draw any correlations of your own.

 

Video Transcription

Howdy, SEOmoz fans. Welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week the second in our two-parter on correlation data for SEO and social media analysis. I'm really excited about this one. We're going to be talking about very specifically a few of the really interesting things that we've observed from correlation data.

Last week, if you recall, we talked about a lot of the basics of correlation data. I showed some simple examples why it's useful both in aggregate and when studying some of your own stuff.

Today I'm going to be talking about some of those big aggregate average numbers collected from thousands of points of data to see what predicts better rankings over all. I want to be really clear, just to reiterate from last week. Remember that correlation is not causation.

One of my favorite examples, the one I like to use a lot is the one with dolphins. So, dolphins swim in pods, and some of the ones that swim in the front of the pods have different characteristics than ones that swim at the end of the pods, just like things in the search results have different features at the front of the search results - the top of the search results position 1, 2, 3 - than the things that are further down on the search results, 5, 10, 15, 20. Right?

So, we look at an analysis of what makes for front of the pod swimmers in both scenarios. With dolphins, it's things like, well, they have larger dorsal fins and they've got stronger flippers. They also have more damage. They've got like scars and pieces of glass or something like that, like cuts and scrapes in their flippers.

So two of those things, the bigger dorsal fins and the stronger flippers, that probably is causal. That's what's causing them to be front of the pod swimmers. But the damage is that really, it has a high correlation, it's got a good correlation with swimming at the front of the pod. Does that mean that more damage means you'll swim at the front of the pod? If we were to bash up a dolphin's fins who's swimming at the end of the pod, would he suddenly move to the front?

No. Right, it's correlation not causation. It's features that predict what people will look like up there. So when we are looking at things that are rankings, just remember this is correlation, not causation. Some of the features here might be things like damaged flippers, not stronger fins. So keep that in mind as we're looking at this.

That said, let's talk about some of these cool things. Number one, one of the things that we saw last June, we did a big analysis of Google versus Bing and the different ranking factors, looking at correlation across 11,000 search results in both. We had a very, very small standard error so that we can be very sure that these correlation numbers go across probably all the search results at the time.

We looked at things like number of linking root domains and the keyword in the title, the keyword in the domain name, document length. We looked at the length of the title and mozRank and PageRank and dozens of other features. What we found was that Google and Bing are not so different. In fact, on a lot of the SEO basics, the things that you would do for Google or for Bing are the same that you would do for the other engine.

That's really cool to learn because it means that we don't have to develop one site that's trying to rank well in Google and one site that's trying to rank well in Bing. We do different things for different ones of them. No, in fact, these engines are really, really similar. Then, of course, we found out in January of this year that Google had been running these experiments because they thought Bing's rankings looked too close to Google rankings. They were worried, and so they did this click stream, honey pot, and, of course, discovered that Bing was essentially measuring through Internet Explorer where people click after they perform search on any engine, including Google. Google got upset about this.

Nevertheless, I think that says, oh well, our analysis that these two engines are pretty similar, kind of verified by some other data including Google people thinking, hey, wait a minute these are looking really, really similar, right?

We get this big takeaway that, unlike the late '90s or even the early 2000s when SEOs used to build different websites targeting different search engines because they wanted different things, today we can really build one. That's a great takeaway. God, it saves us a ton of time and worry.

Number two, Facebook shares are highly correlated with Google rankings. This was one of our takeaways very, very recently, in March of this year, so just about a month ago, maybe a little less, depending when this Whiteboard Friday airs. You can see here that Facebook shares, in fact, were our single highest correlated, number one. Highest correlated metric with ranking higher, predicting that you would rank higher in Google among all the things that we measured.

We measured about 150 different factors, everything from keyword usage on the page to link metrics, to things like tweets and that kind of stuff. Those Facebook shares just seem to have an incredibly good correlation. A correlation so high, especially in, remember this 0.29 on a scale of 0 to 1 would not be that high. In a really simple system, where there's only one or two metrics that predict, 0.29 would be probably kind of low. But in a system where there's supposedly 200 plus unique ranking factors - probably much more than 200 plus at this point - but in a system with that much complexity to see one metric that predicts such a high correlation is extremely rare. In fact, we've only seen a few metrics that are up in that 0.29, 0.3 range ever in the history of looking at correlation data.

We can kind of say, huh, seems like Google must be using these Facebook shares. Not necessarily directly. They might be getting more data from Facebook, but there's something going on there. Of course, Google themselves and Bing as well admitted in an interview with Danny Sullivan on Search Engine Land that yes, we use data from Facebook and from Twitter directly in our web rankings to help with our algorithmic search. Facebook shares, you can see that correlation. You've got to be thinking, as an SEO, how do I get me some of those Facebook shares on my pages?

Number three, we looked at, one of the weirdest things to come out of our March 2011 data was the fact that no-follow links seemed to have a positive correlation with rankings. One of the things we did when we saw no-follow links having a really high correlation was we went, well that's just weird. Maybe what's going on here is that no-follow links and followed links have a high correlation with each other, and in fact, they do. If you have lots of no-follow links, you tend to also have lots of followed links. So, that makes sense. All right maybe that's all that's causing it. But then there's this one weird, weird data point - well, there's several weird ones - but there's this one weird data point around the percentage of followed links having a negative correlation, kind of a strong negative correlation with rankings, which sounds weird, but it suggests that websites and web pages that don't have any no-follow links aren't performing as well as those who have at least some or some reasonable percentage of them.

You kind of think about it. You scratch your head, like, "What? Wait, does Google want me to have no-follow links?" When you think that way, just remember correlation, not causation. So, it's not necessarily that Google's saying, "Oh, well, this website doesn't have a lot of no-follow links so let's rank them lower." That seems kind of crazy to me. I don't think that 's the case. Possible but I don't think that's what's happening.

What I think that's happening is that people who do natural things, normal websites, this is not normal. It is not normal to have a website that only has followed links. It's almost like, man, you must be doing something funny because normal websites earn links from no-follows. They get linked to on Wikipedia, which is no-follow. They have blog comments that people leave and point to them. Those are no-follow. They have social media profiles. Almost all of those are no-follow. People tweet about them. Those are no-follow. There are all of these no-follow links that exist from sort of good places on the Web where you would naturally be mentioned if you're a good website.

So, to have only followed links is weird. No wonder . . . I don't what it is exactly. We don't know what it is exactly that Google's measuring here, but I'm sure they're looking at this, not at this but at metrics that say, huh, this website does not interact in its ecosystem. One of the things that predicts those is no-follow links, and that's why you see that negative correlation.

Lots and lots of cool stuff, interesting data that we can take away from correlations even though we know it's not causal. We can say to ourselves, huh, this probably means, right? This probably means, oh, I'd better be interacting in the environment, and I shouldn't worry about getting no- follow links. This is not going to hurt me. In fact it might actually predict that I'm doing more good things on the Web.

In this case, right, it's saying, oh, you know what, Facebook likes have a much lower correlation, because liking something on Facebook, clicking that thumbs up button is so much easier than sharing and actually posting to your wall. I know the like textually posts to your wall, but it doesn't show up in top news. It only shows up in recent updates. So sharing, oh, that's a good behavior to start encouraging. Maybe I should be encouraging more shares than likes on my pages. Having this, the Google and Bing data says, oh, I can build one website and do a lot of the key basics that are going to be the same for all of them.

This type of data is incredibly useful. We love doing it. We plan on doing a ton more. If you've got requests for things that you would like to see us do, please put them in the comments and we will be happy to try to measure them in the future.

Hope this data is interesting for you. Hope lots of you start doing more correlation analyses, rigorous data analyses of this type. I think it will be assume if we, as a community, start to make a lot of our insight and our intuition a little more scientifically based, math based. I'm very excited for it.

All right, everyone. Thanks for watching these two Whiteboard Fridays. We will see you again next week. Take care.

Video transcription by SpeechPad.com


Do you like this post? Yes No

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/OsaVIGnIjo4/correlation-data-for-seo-and-social-media-analysis-part-2-whiteboard-friday

Shakira Shaquille Oneal Simon Cowell Stephen King

Social Media ? 5 Tips for Building Vibrant Branded Online Communities

According to Mashable; 5 Tips for Building Vibrant Branded Online Communities

Justin Fogarty is the online community manager at Ariba, a leading provider of collaborative business commerce solutions. Follow Justin on Twitter @justacio or join the thousands interacting on his community, the Ariba Exchange.

The goal of many companies is to facilitate a vibrant online community around a brand or product. ?Engagement? is a refrain we?ve all heard time and again, but it is crucial if you want to gain traction on the social web. We can look to the undisputed champ of engagement, Facebook, to inform our own strategies, communities and web presence.

This isn?t just about creating better Facebook ads, or even in getting more ?Likes.? The bigger question is, what can our brand communities take away from the success of Facebook?s platform?


1. Facilitate What Customers Already Want to Do


It?s not about ROI or advertising dollars at the beginning. It?s not about messaging and positioning. Customers will come back to a place with a compelling reason for going there in the first place. Let the user determine the model, and look at the type of user that you want to attract as the primary driver behind the online presence.

In Facebook?s case, they started with simply facilitating the sharing of information ? from personal profiles to pictures. They?ve kept that same core model but expanded into everything from shopping to events. What can you facilitate that will help your customers?


2. Extend Traditional Success


Most communities, like Facebook, are natural extensions of what happens in the real world. Facebook mimics personal relationships. Your online community should mimic the positive interactions traditionally formed within your company. If connections are made at trade shows, then start discussions online that would typically take place at a trade show. If your company?s growth is from sales in a particular vertical, then facilitate connections with influencers in that market.

3. Keep it Clean


If there are two things we learned from MySpace, not everyone is a web/UI designer, and people prefer a clean community. This is online design 101, but it applies to your brand as well.

The web has the power to infinitely enhance your capabilities online, but start small. Keep a simple, clean interface with a clear direction for a user to personally benefit. It will keep your brand?s image in focus, and give users a sense of the benefits they?ll get from engaging with you.


4. Treat Engagement as a Long-Term Process


Your content should be short, frequent and easy to engage with. Facebook?s News Feed is effective because of these principles. This keeps visitors coming back and spending more time with your community.

If done right, these returning visitors will slowly phase out some other older, inferior communication tools. For example, think about the things that Facebook has trumped ? from classmates.com to that old personal blog you haven?t updated in months.


5. Make Engagement Easy


Generally, most people online are ?lurkers,? viewing sites and communities without ever interacting with them. Enter the ?Like? button, which made engagement quick, easy and approachable. With your business, create a community of quick and easy participation. This will get people invested in your message and enable continuous interaction.
Keeping these tips in mind, your business will be well on its way to creating unique experiences, increasing engagement and enthusiasm for your brand, and developing a truly interactive and meaningful community.

Tags: , ,



Source: http://www.sq1agency.com/blog/?p=2908

Daniel Radcliffe David Beckham David Letterman Derek Jeter

3 Ways to Jump on the Blogging Bandwagon!

You can read a blog about pretty much anything on the Internet these days. Even a blog about blogging! With the popularity of Facebook and Twitter, blogs are another social media tool where businesses can reach the public in an open forum for an instant connection.

How do you maximize a blog to its fullest potential? You want to reach customers and offer them a rich source of information that keeps them coming back for more. Remember, people will only read your blog if they find value in it.

Use these 3 tips to enrich your company blog!

1. Express Yourself

The last thing you want to do is bore your reader. Blogs are supposed to be interesting. Pretend you?re having a conversation with your reader when you write. Don?t be careless, they still expect smart writing. Keep the flow natural, even paced and entertaining. Telling stories will keep your readers? interest and offer reference for your material.

2. Personalize It

Don?t forget the human element. The blog wasn?t written by a robot. Engage your reader with interesting quips, tangible facts or short anecdotes about your company or the topic.

3. Write Smart

You are representing your company, so beef up the grammar and spelling. You may want to have someone proofread your blog entry before you post it. Careless mistakes can hurt your company?s reputation so take care in your writing.

So what are you waiting for? It?s time to jump on the blogging bandwagon!

Tags:

Source: http://www.submitawebsite.com/blog/2011/05/3-ways-to-jump-on-the-blogging-bandwagon.html

Carmen Electra Charlie Sheen Charlize Theron Chelsea Handler

Improving Reporting Efficiency and Relevance

[fivefilters.org: unable to retrieve full-text content]

Posted by Sam Crocker

This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.

Hey Mozzers! A quick introduction for those of you who don't know me: my name is Sam Crocker. I work for a global media agency called OMD and am based in London. In addition to our work on (primarily) enterprise SEO clients we also occasionally find time to work on our search and social blog. I am an avid consumer of content in the SEO field and when I'm not doing client work I am constantly working on testing out new ideas, (working on) improving internal processes and reading/sharing SEO and tech stories on Twitter. I am also extremely happy to be writing another post for SEOmoz after a bit of a hiatus.

Introduction

As some of you may well recall, my old boss and good friend Tom Critchlow featured on White Board Friday back on April 14th talking about How to Make SEO Happen. There should be no doubt about the fact that this is an important factor to all SEO practitioners and consultants because at the end of the day it may be nice to give advice and hide behind issues around how "it's the dev's fault" or other classics that we've all been forced to use (let's be honest, sometimes it is the dev's fault). However, the obvious fact is that we are hired based upon our reputation or our price point, but we are retained based upon our ability to deliver results.

Perhaps, more importantly still, we are paid based upon our ability to report on the results we deliver. It is all fine and good if we get some outstanding links to our clients from "well respected" and "authoritative" sources, but at the end of the day, most of our clients are business people and regardless of how hard you worked to get that link from the New York Times, if it hasn't had a positive and quantifiable impact on the site and on their bottom line, you can kiss that retainer goodbye.

However, any of you who are familiar with me and know about my tendency to complain about unnecessary tasks and poor allocation's of resource will know that reporting, much like SEO forecasting, are not the way that I like to use my time or my clients budget. Important as they may be I don't revel in the opportunity to create loads of pretty (and confusing) charts and graphs and then write up copious justifications for what I have done and why it did or did not work. As such, I was more than happy to volunteer when Tom asked me to write a post about saving time on reporting - as he was shocked by the number of Mozzers who seemed not to mind spending too much time on reporting.

The bottom line is this: clients have hired you both to deliver results and communicate those results with them in a manner that they can understand. Reporting is only valuable if the client reads the report (largely dependent on them understanding what they are looking at) and that it is profitable. You could measure the profits of this report in a number of ways - I've even known some to attribute time reporting to "new business" as it is essential to retaining clients. This is not, in my view, the right way to do things.

As with forecasting, SEO reporting kind of sucks, but when it needs to be done, it needs to be done as quickly as possible and be targeted to the relevant audience. I won't go as far as Tom to say that we can eliminate it all together (much as I would like to) but there are clearly a number of ways in which we can cut down on the amount of time it takes.

Speaking of saving time, if you are very short on time and just want the long-term panacea to the reporting-suck click here. The rest of the post should help you improve everything else in the short term though!

[Note from Tom: I'd like to quickly clarify my position here and note the difference between reporting and reports. My original whiteboard friday uses the word reports but is really talking about strategy & recommendation reports. I believe length strategy reports are not good, but I think monthly reporting is definitely a good thing. After all, as I mention in my WBF communication is the key to solve all problems and reporting is part of that. This is totally my fault for not being clear in my whiteboard friday and I'll likely write a follow-up post soon to clarify. My comment here also explains my thinking a bit more clearly. Sam shares awesome tips here on making reporting actionable and clear but I don't want people thinking I'm against all reporting :). Now, on with the post!]

Part I: Tips to Improve Understanding

Odds are, your client receives reporting for a handful of reasons. You may report on your work out of moral obligation (in which case you're likely not confident in your work), you may report as an opportunity to make more money (in which case you are a savvy business person, but you'd be better off reallocating these funds), you may report because every client expects a report (in which case you are wasting your time because they probably don't read it) or, in the best of cases you are reporting because your client genuinely knows why they have hired you and want to see that you are meeting the original goals discussed or can at least account for their investment if goals are not being achieved (in which case you are extraordinarily lucky).

seriously wtf graph

Avoid This (via)

Step 1: What Are Your Shared Goals

Most SEO projects start with some sort of goal in mind. Sometimes it takes a bit of coaxing (I can't tell you the number of times I've had to challenge a prospective with "yes but what do you want the website to do?"), but it is important to establish what the client's goals for the project are and to lead them to the factors on which they should be focused.

Note: You may have to tell them what they should be looking for. These clients are not always the most fun to deal with and it is important to agree these things before starting work.
Step 2: Identify the Target Audience

If the project you are undertaking is for one person, you better be prepared to get to know this person well and learn what they expect, how to talk to them, etc.

However, there is no question that you will prepare a report differently for the Board than you will do for the developers or an in-house SEO. Make sure you know who will be reading the report and create different reports where necessary.

*Bonus timesaver - be realistic with the client. If you can get them to admit that they will only read a report once every three months send over a "status sheet" once a month and run quarterly reports face-to-face.

Step 3: Create Reports Relevant to the Target Audience

The first month or two is always going to be a bit difficult and your client will likely have plenty to learn depending on their experience. If you are patient with the client in the first month, build a report-style based upon the recipient of the report's knowledge base and include only the most relevant benchmarks for your campaign you will save a lot of time in the long run.

Make sure you get everyone who will see the reports in the room with you and walk them through the first reports!

Base Level Reporting (for the Board, Head of Marketing or "Monthly Update")

There are certain elements that you should probably plan to include in all reports, these "essentials" are what I like to refer to as "Base Level Reporting" (BLR). A BLR should be as easy to read and short as possible. The important thing to think about is what are the bare minimum metrics on which I should report?

What to include:

  • (If applicable) Value of Sales from Organic Non-Brand Visits (Month-on-Month)
  • Organic Branded Visits vs. Organic Non-Brand Visits (Month-on-Month)
  • Total Number of keywords sending traffic (Month-on-Month)
  • Progression against agreed goals
  • "Status Sheet"

Executives of large businesses don't have time to focus on every individual ranking (nor often do they care) and they certainly don't have time to read about every single link that has been built. More importantly - as Justin very adeptly pointed out on the Raven blog - reporting on link building can make your reports suck.

example status sheet

Note- the "status sheet" is in my view one of the most important ways to document who is responsible for what and what the timeline is. This can be incredibly powerful if you are ever dealing with a slightly less motivated client to document the fact that you both have agreed obligations as part of the project and will ensure that you are not always taking orders from the client or grief for "overdue" tasks. It goes both ways and will keep everyone honest.

Quarterly/Yearly Reporting (May be more Regular for In-House SEO Manager, Marketing Directors, Webmasters, etc.)

The quarterly report can be essential and warrants a slightly larger time investment. However, this does not need to become overly onerous, but should include more detail about what you have done (i.e. how your time has been spent, how rankings have performed, etc.). This type of report truly is a measure of performance and effort combined. It is an opportunity to go over your biggest successes and potentially discuss strategy.

What to cover (in addition to the BLR):

  • "Visibility metrics" - I would advise against showing every single move for every single term.
  • Organic Traffic Brand vs. Non-Brand (Year on Year) + Commentary on seasonal trends
  • Top 10 New Terms Sending Traffic
  • Links Built - provide list as appendix, report on links by MozRank buckets if required
  • Additional organic traffic generated (Digg, StumbleUpon, etc.)
  • Performance of engagement metrics or goals (e.g. PDF downloads)
  • Performance of individual content (linkbait) efforts

This report will be more time consuming to pull together but still should not be overcomplicated. The vast majority of these items should be supplied as a means to build trust and provide documentation for their investment (e.g. links built) but do not warrant in-depth analysis. I would advise against supplying the full list of keywords and ranking within the report (e.g. visibility metrics) as they can be confusing and over-complicate the situation. This can always be provided as an appendix.

example new links chart
Example "New Links" Chart

*KEY POINT - this should not be a written report. Get together with all relevant parties and talk through some slides - it will take less time if you set an agenda and stick to it. Feel free to provide handouts, but do not write out your entire strategy and try to justify every single task. Firstly, it almost always looks more defensive in person and secondly, it's way too easy for your competitor to use if you ever lose an account.

Project Review Reporting

The BLR should be largely neutral in tone. By all means you should celebrate huge successes as and when they occur by way of a phone call or an email. The Quarterly report allows a bit more opportunity to focus on individual successes, however it is still important to stay mostly neutral. However, at the end of the project or the end of a fiscal year is an opportunity for you to focus solely on your achievements. This is the time to sell so feel free to bust out all of your case studies and be biased here.

However, painting a rosy picture every month means that the success will begin to mean less and the failures will be more glaring (especially if you are not reporting on them regularly). Save your big "look at us" case studies for the end of the month. You can share these successes over a celebratory beer with your contact at the agency but don't go cluttering up every monthly report talking about how great you are.

Additional Communication (ad hoc)

It is obviously important (particularly if you want to cut down on reporting time at the end of the month) that you stay in regular contact with your clients. Although some agencies rely on a service model "you get one day a week" it's important to deliver education and regular communication. You don't have to be on the phone every day and you need to know when to rein it in, but you should be available to discuss strategy and implementation at least once a week. If it becomes an issue, put a cap on it.

Also, there is no justification for writing an individual email to every single one of your clients whenever something changes. Your client may not have time to monitor every change in the marketplace and in the algorithms (and it's probably best they don't) but you should keep them up to date. If you create a blog and tell them where to find it and update it regularly this should be fine. Alternatively, you could always write a recap newsletter that everyone receives once a month.

Most importantly, and in the spirit of being open and transparent, be ready to jump on the phone when things go south. There is nothing a client hates more than to phone their SEO agency to ask them why they've dropped out of the rankings. If you establish the trust and catch these things when they occur you can drastically cut back on the number of "how come Beth sees us ranking number 4, but I see us ranking first!?" conversations.

Part II: Ways to Increase Profitability, Save Time... and Get Better Results for Your Clients

Alright folks, so hopefully the above has helped you gain a better understanding of the types of things we like to report on and ways to make sure you are speaking to the right person and in a language they understand.

One of the main lessons from the above section is that sometimes it is actually quicker to produce two reports than to try to combine a report designed for an in-house SEO manager with one that is designed for a Head of Marketing who has five other advertising channels to worry about. However, the other lesson that is a bit more subtle is: you do not always need a report.

I hope the following will increase the profitability of your reporting, save you loads of time and will ultimately get better results for your clients. The below are the lessons Tom hoped I would share.

Option 1: Increase your Rate

It's a realistic option. You could always charge more for your reporting. If it is something your client cares exorbitantly about, be very specific about the costs associated with "better" reporting.

We have a dedicated team of data scientists that we could use for reporting and though I'm sure our clients would be impressed with the results, I'm also not sure that they would like the cost associated. More importantly, your client doesn't need that expensive 50 page report.

Increasing your Rate is an option, but not one that I would ever prefer and not one that would likely lead to better results for any of our clients. The only case in which I would suggest increasing your rate would be to allocate that money to building a template, investing in a dashboard, or offsetting a software for reporting.

Option 2: Reduce Time Spent on Reporting

For me, this is clearly the preferred option. Although charging more money for reporting is nice, spending more time reporting is not something I really fancy - nor is it something I would expect anyone else on the team to spend too much of their valuable time on. Below are some of the tactics I've made use of to reduce reporting times.

1.) Be transparent and open with your hours

The benefits to this in a number of other respects is obvious, however it is a powerful bargaining tool. If you are open with your hourly rate and willing to share the previous month(s) breakdown of hours spent on work a strong argument can be made about how much time as follows. If your rate for your time is £100/hr (and you should know your rate) it is as simple as this:

"Last month we spent 6 hours on your report. - at a cost of £600, but more importantly at a cost of 6 hours of my time. You have hired me to consult on and implement SEO which is what I do most efficiently and most effectively. Please consider investing that money in a software to improve reporting or consider reducing the frequency of our reports"

Harvest Report
Note, my favourite time tracking software of the moment is Harvest - a big "thank you" to all who suggested it.

2.) Automate as much as possible

This one also seems fairly obvious but it's something that we've all been guilty of at one point or another. We can't all be Excel wizards and building a template can be costly. This is where you can save a lot of time by making use of an expert to build a template for you. If the template is intuitive enough you pretty much copy and paste data/segments from the Google Analytics API and the rest is auto-generated.

As you will see from my last point, my personal view is that this should be taken to the next level.

3.) Report less frequently

Another obvious opportunity. As I've touched on in a number of instances above there is no reason to report on all the metrics listed in the BLR and Quarterly Report every single month. It is important to be accountable for your work but having too many charts and too much analysis month-on-month will almost certainly lead to your clients no longer reading your reports- in which case everyone loses.

This is exactly why it's so important to have a frank conversation with your clients and remind them how valuable your time is and how much better spent (break it down to dollars and cents) your time would be creating great content and getting links than on filling out a report.

4.) Just report ROI

Ranking reports and "new traffic" are great and sometimes necessary for reporting. However, what have we really been hired for? This all comes back to the notion that our audience wants to know what we've been up to, but if you are getting results (the very results that you all agree you have targeted) the rest can be supplied as documentation and potentially never need discussion at all.

In the ideal situation you don't even need all of the metrics from the BLR in a monthly report. In the case of eCommerce clients ultimately you should be reporting on number and value of sales generated from your efforts and perhaps providing an appendix or two to document your linkbuilding activities, beyond this, try to save the other stuff for a quarterly or biannual report.

At the end of the day this should be the main monthly focus of any eCommerce client whilst brand building may be something to keep an eye on and report on less regularly. This isn't always an option but is just one example of how to reduce the intensity and frequency of your reporting.

5.) Present your report (PPT or Prezi)

Another no brainer for me really. How do you feel when you receive an email or document that is 50 pages long? I feel frustrated and overwhelmed. The solution is to set up a monthly phone call (or face-to-face where possible) and present your charts/figures to the client. Send over all of the data a day before the call and make sure they have a serious look through it before you speak on the phone.

Setting up a phone call prompts and ensures action from the clients' perspective (it means they are much more likely to read your report) and also shows that you are proactive. I cannot tell you over the years how many clients I've seen won and lost as a result of poor communication - and sometimes there have been great results to back up the work!

At the end of the day odds are you don't want to spend loads of your time writing pages and pages of analysis, so walk them through the report and let them ask questions!

Biggest Timesavers:

6.) Empower and /Educate

In the long run, absolutely nothing has saved me more time on reporting than speaking with the client at the beginning of a project and getting a feel for what they expect or want out of a report. Questions to ask:

Who else will see this report? What will you (the client) be judged upon? What other things would you ideally like to see in a report?

It's important to revisit this after the first 3-4 months as well to make sure that they are getting all of the data they need, but also that they are not getting loads of superfluous data they don't understand.

For me, it is all about building your template or dashboard based upon their needs, billing the client for this cost and taking the time to teach them what it is they are looking at, when "up" is a good thing and when it is a bad thing so that ultimately they can look through larger sets of data on their own time should they choose.

If you are planning to have a long relationship with this client the 5-6 hours this may take up front will save you loads of time in the long run.

7.) Dashboard, Dashboard, Dashboard

Pro

So, this is a bit of a new one for our team but we have recently been privately testing a reporting solution that we think shows a great deal of promise. These solutions tend to be immensely costly which, again, means having an earnest conversation with the client about footing the bill but as many clients as we can get set-up with this solution we will pursue this option because it makes the most of a scarce resource.

Some of these platforms create dashboards (based on ranking and analytics data) that are truly impressive and, perhaps more importantly, dynamic. These platforms allow you to create which reports are created (see above suggestions in the BLR and QR sections) but the client can then click around and get stuck into the data if they are so inclined.

conductor image

Once this has been set-up it truly is a "set it and forget it" type situation. It will require more up-front training for the client but it is a must for any tech/SEO savvy client. Some of these products are still early days and have limited support/data for Europe so be very scrupulous and ask a lot of questions if you're thinking of going this route!

*If this interests you have a look at Covario, Bright Edge, Conductor or any others you can find!

Con

The con to going this route is that at the moment the solutions that are actually worth their cost are stupidly expensive and often the cost is set-up on a "per client" basis rather than an "unlimited number for a set cost" basis. The result is, this will rule this option out for almost any SME or local-business clients.

However, as I mentioned earlier, there are plenty of extraordinarily talented developers and Excel wizards out there. This is something that could easily be created on a microsite for your client(s) and would almost certainly be less expensive in the long run.

For me, dashboarding still has a long way to go, but in mind it will replace about 90% of the time I spend on reporting over the next six months... and I'm pretty happy about that.

I hope you've found this post helpful and would love to hear your thoughts on reporting in the comments. Any other time-saving measures you've taken and care to share with the class would be much appreciated or if you're a bit shy feel free to share them with me on Twitter.


Do you like this post? Yes No

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/MEk9mVps8oA/improving-reporting-efficiency-and-relevance

Rascal Flatts Ray Romano Reese Witherspoon Robert Downey Jr

7 Steps to Making a Great Landing Page for PPC

Written on September 29, 2010 ? 1:49 am | by Shell Harris |

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Good Landing PagesLanding pages are heavily used to attract customers to where you want them on your website: the sales payment page being the ultimate objective for most ebusinesses.  Like everything else in life, there are right ways to go about creating a landing page and a million wrong ways.  Creating a good landing page is vital because this is what many first time users are going to see of your web presence, and you cannot afford for it to be the last they see of you!

Here is our simple, 7 ?step program to creating a landing page which works:

Step One: Identify the USP

Every business and product will have a USP ? Unique Selling Point.  Your USP may be you are the cheapest company in your zip code for your product or service, provide the tastiest food, the coldest beer, the fastest, the cleanest, the loudest, the closest, the ?whatever? you do which sets you apart from the rest of the competition.

A USP will usually be combined in your primary headline, but it may be relegated to a secondary headline where you already have a short and sweet headline.  A good example is this one from Amazon:

?Earth?s Biggest Bookstore?

Step Two: Briefly Outline Benefits

Your USP headline attracts attention, but now you have to satisfy the customer?s initial curiosity.  You should have ONE paragraph, using BULLET POINTS to answer this question from your customer, ?Why do I care this product or service??

You are outlining benefits here ? what will this product do for your customer.  For example:

  • We are the cheapest which means you save money ? GUARANTEED!
  • You get the best quality ? GUARANTEED!
  • We deliver next day nationwide which means you don?t have to wait ? GUARANTEED!

Go back and edit this paragraph continuously until you have just bare bones, so taking line one:

  • We?re the cheapest so you save money ? GUARANTEED!

Step Three: Use a Picture

This is known as the ?Hero Shot?; think the cowboy in the Marlboro ads or the hunk in an aftershave campaign or the smiling couples for Viagra commercials.  They show the product in use, giving context which either forms an empathetic connection with the customer or appeals to their aspirations.

Typically, the hero shot will be a photo, but it can also be diagram showing where the product fits into an existing problem which is typically experienced by your target market readership, or it may be a chart showing where you rank with the competition (top!) or a simple graphic selling a number, e.g.? 50% OFF!?

Step Four: Set the Context of Use

Context of use is important, and this is closely related to step 3 and the Hero Shot.  Context of use provides the user with ?real life? application; for instance, if you are selling a beverage, show it being drunk ? if its beer, show it being drunk in a bar; if it?s champagne, show it being drunk on a yacht on a blue sea.

Obviously photographic imagery and video are excellent for doing this, but you can also invoke context of use by displaying a client list or by using testimonials.

Step Five: Get the Customer?s Information

Ask for the user?s email and/or contact information ? this is extremely important for all landing pages, but it is especially vital for landing pages selling to other businesses (B2B).  In this instance, a landing page?s primary objective will probably be lead generation and unless you gain the contact information, you fail!

The best way to get contact information is to ask for it, typically providing some freebie or promotional pricing for a limited period.  Use a privacy statement too ? this enhances your professionalism.

Step Six: Provide a 2nd Chance Safety Net

Not every visitor will turn into a converted lead or sale and you will experience a substantial number of users who are interested in you but not ready to buy now.  Provide them with a second chance to do business with you, known as a safety net, and this can take many different forms:

  • Add a button for the user to subscribe to your Facebook profile, Twitter feed or other social media presence you maintain;
  • Offer to email a reminder;
  • Offer a freebie download such as a whitepaper; or
  • Bookmark the page.

Step Seven: The Call to Action

This is the ultimate purpose of the landing page ? the final act you want the user to perform and at some point you have to ask them to do it.  The call to action may be to buy your product, it may be to complete a survey, to navigate through to a sales page, to pick up a phone and call your sales team, to add themselves to your email bulletin?whatever it is that you want the user to do before they leave the landing page.

Examples include:

?Meet the World?s Best Browser? and immediately below is the download box for the Firefox browser

?Things Mac? placed immediately above a download box and a ?Purchase: Buy things Mac now? box

?NCover helps .NET teams all around the world deploy applications with fewer bugs? and placed below is a download box with an offer in it, ?Download NCover ? 21-Day Free Trial

Related posts:

  1. Does Your Website Suffer from These 4 Common Copywriting Mistakes?
  2. Unique Product Descriptions ? SEO Tip Week 40
  3. Increase Conversions on Your Website
  4. SEO for Interior Webpages ? SEO Tip Week 20
  5. Internal Search Lifts Conversions

Source: http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/7-steps-to-making-a-great-landing-page-for-ppc/

Tom Cruise Tom Hanks Tyler Perry U2

Facebook Now Pays Users 10 Cents To Watch Certain Ads

According to Mashable; Facebook Now Pays Users 10 Cents To Watch Certain Ads


Facebook introduced a program Thursday that offers consumers a financial incentive to watch ads on the site.

Facebook will now reward users who watch certain ads with Facebook Credits, which can be redeemed to purchase goods on Facebook Deals, the company?s new Groupon-like daily deals service. The incentive, however, is not huge. Initially, the average ad will yield one credit, which is equivalent to 10 cents.

The ads will mostly be in games. CrowdStar, Digital Chocolate and Zynga are among the participating game publishers. Facebook is working with Sharethrough, SocialVibe, Epic Media and SupersonicAds to serve ads on the program as well as TrialPay, which will provide analytics.

Dan Greenberg, CEO of Sharethrough, says Facebook?s move represents ?a step away from interruptive advertising.? Greenberg, whose clients include Microsoft and Nestle, says his network won?t deliver traditional advertising but rather branded entertainment, which consumers will want to watch and share with friends.

Incentivizing consumers to watch ads is one solution for Facebook?s low banner click-through rates. The move comes after Facebook expanded its Credits program last week to let consumers use the Credits to buy real-world goods advertised in Deals. Previously, the credits, which were awarded for consumers who signed up for various programs (like magazine subscriptions) or bought outright could only buy virtual goods.

Square One a Dallas Digital Agency are experts in social media optimization.



Source: http://www.sq1agency.com/blog/?p=2840

Eva Longoria Eva Longoria Parker Eva Mendes Floyd Mayweather

Google Instant Previews now in Sponsored Links

Google Instant Previews feature in sponsored links

Google Instant Previews feature in sponsored links

In the field of Internet Marketing, we can market and promote our business, products either by paying or at free of cost. Search Engine Marketing a.k.a SEM is called as paid advertising and Search Engine Optimization a.k.a SEO is a free advertising service. SEM can be used only on the particular occasions in order to earn more money and profit within a short span of time and at the same time, the keywords may get downturn at any instant because if some other ready to pay more for the same keywords. Hence, there is no guarantee for this marketing and nowadays people choose SEO more than SEM as SEO will stand for long time if processed in an ethical manner.

As we all known that Google search engine results page a.k.a SERP is a webpage where it displays the list of websites from the search engine database with the corresponding snippet information based on the keyword queried in the search box. You can view the results in two different section in SERP. The left section is called as Organic results which are based on SEO and the right side results are called as Sponsored links listed by means of SEM. You can also identify the Sponsored links in left side available at the top of organic results where it has different background color in the snippet itself.

Instant Preview is an awesome feature provided by Google couple of months back which enables us to view the preview of a website in SERP itself just by clicking on the snippet. Initially they have put this option for the organic links alone, but today I noticed this feature in Sponsored links too. Yup, now you can view the instant preview for sponsored links also.

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 26th, 2011 at 6:37 pm and is filed under Google, Internet Updates, Search Engines. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Source: http://www.cogzidel.com/blog/2011/04/google-instant-previews-now-in-sponsored-links/

Madonna Manny Pacquiao Maria Sharapova Mariah Carey

Content is King, Write Some Original Content

If you ask an internet expert about what is the most important aspect of a website, in most cases (in fact in 99% cases) he will tell you it is the content of a website. From different perspectives and for several reasons, content is really important. For people who use the internet to gather important information, original content on a website is what they look for. On search engines, the more original is the content, the higher ranking the website will get and eventually more traffic too. It is no exaggeration to say that content is KING on the internet and will always be.

It is therefore important for websites to incorporate original, useful and interesting content to be successful. This is because the more useful and original the content of a website, more people will visit that website again and again. This becomes more rampant if the website keeps on adding more original content on daily basis either in the form of articles, news, opinion, or other similar categories.

So what makes content such a big issue on the web?

Well, for one it is something that brings traffic to your website and products via search engines. Nobody will visit your website until they don?t know that you offer them what they want. They can find this information through a search only if you have original and relevant content available on your website.

But what makes the content original and good for a website?

To start with, your content needs to appeal your target audience, something which they can find useful about a particular topic or your products. Make your content different and unique and don?t just copy things over the internet or other resources.

Apparently, writing an original content is much easier than re-writing existing content, unlike most people believe. An original content will always show writers? own personality and flare in it. Despite having similar facts, an original content will always provide something new to the readers either in terms of style, information or approach. However, make sure that the content remains interesting and informative no matter whichever style or elements you are using in it.

Your content should be easy to read and understand don?t worry about using specific keywords in it.

It is better to simply write news and articles about your niche or industry as this will ensure that your readers will become interested in buying your product.

In case you don?t have the writing skills to write original content, you can always hire an experienced writer to write original content for you in exchange for a minimum fees or acknowledgement. Before publishing your content, proofread it and always run it through Copyscape or other plagiarism detecting software to ensure that your content is 100% original.

An original content can make or break your website. Therefore, it is important that you pay considerable amount of attention to it. Remember, in the search engine-driven sphere, content is the king and thus, should be original enough to make your stand out from the rest.

Blog Homepage | Top of Page

Source: http://www.seogodfather.com/blog/content-is-king-write-some-original-content/

Chelsea Handler Cheryl Cole Christina Aguilera Coldplay

Yahoo!?s Delicious is acquired by YouTube Founders

Yahoo shutting down its products one by one, you people known that Yahoo! Buzz was shut down by April 21, 2011. Now it?s the turn to Delicious, one of the most popular and top ranking social bookmarking website bring huge traffic to the websites. Of course, it is a sad news indeed! We guys are using delicious often to promote, share and save interesting stories. But, we can satisfy ourselves as Yahoo! do not shut down Delicious instead they sold it to another internet company ?AVOS?, started by YouTube founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen. A question may raise in your mind, then what about the bookmarks saved so far, are we lose them? Definitely, the answer is NO! You can transfer your entire saved bookmarks from Delicious to AVOS just by agreeing the terms and conditions of AVOS. You can watch the change if you login delicious where you are asked to confirm the login credentials and account information as well as ?Agree the Terms of service? of AVOS for smooth transfer of bookmarks without any interruption.

Delicious acquired by Youtube Founders

Delicious acquired by Youtube Founders

News from AVOS,

  1. AVOS promise users the same great service, what Delicious was provided and even easier & more fun ways to save, share, and discover the web?s ?tastiest? content.
  2. ?We?re excited to work with this fantastic community and take Delicious to the next level,? said Chad Hurley, CEO of AVOS.
  3. ?We see a tremendous opportunity to simplify the way users save and share content they discover anywhere on the web.?

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, April 29th, 2011 at 6:44 pm and is filed under Business Related, Internet Updates, Social Networking, Web Applications, yahoo. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Source: http://www.cogzidel.com/blog/2011/04/yahoos-delicious-is-acquired-by-youtube-founders/

Steve Carell Steven Spielberg Taylor Swift Tiger Woods

Post-Panda, Your Original Content is Being Outranked by Scrapers & Partners

[fivefilters.org: unable to retrieve full-text content]

Posted by BryanCrow

This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.

A weird thing has happened as a result of panda. Something you might have expected Google's Search Quality testers to catch before rolling the update out. Due to the domain-wide nature of the signal, high-quality, original content produced by the websites who were negatively impacted are now being ranked below the exact same content, republished by partners to whom they syndicate. Even more egregious, they are also being outranked by scrapers who effectively steal and republish the same content without permission or credit.

I have seen this briefly mentioned by observers, but I haven't seen this phenomenon transparently documented either in SEO press or in the Panda Google forum. The purpose of this post is to transparently share data from the site WonderHowTo.com (of which I am the CTO) and locate others experiencing a similar phenomenon.

Pre Panda

For three years, we at WonderHowTo organized the sprawling world of HowTo with taxonomical zeal and very human curation. By January, we had grown to more than 10mm monthly uniques. As our community formed, we began to shift our efforts towards the concept of covering timely news in the HowTo space (there is astounding innovation each day among the 427 subcategories we follow).

Our journalistic cred grew, and at the beginning of the year, two fantastic syndication partners Business Insider, and Huffington Post recognized our quality and eagerly published our articles in their sections (primarily Technology). On occasion, we noticed that our articles were outranked by our partners, but over the course of a few days, Google always got it right, recognizing the source as WonderHowTo. For the record, pre-Panda, we cannot recall one instance when a scraper outranked us with our own content in Google. Never. There seemed to be order in the universe.

Post Panda

Our Google traffic fell by 40%. Among our 1 million indexed pages, we experienced plenty of displaced rankings. Before getting into the what, how, & why, one thing has stood out as alarmingly egregious: Original content created by us is no longer able to rise to the top above our partners or even scrapers who republish our content. Ever. Panda branded us the Rosa Parks of content, forcing us to the back of Google's ranking bus, along with all the other sites which fit its profiling.

Crediting the Original Source - Google vs Bing

I took a look at the articles we're promoting on our home page and syndicating to Business Insider and Huffington Post. As I mentioned earlier, our articles also tend to get scraped and republished on dozens of sites within minutes of them being published. Post panda, it turns out Bing is doing a better (though still imperfect) job of ranking the original source (WonderHowTo) above the scrapers & syndication partners. Here are examples from a few recent posts (For simplicity, I searched for each article's exact title):

"How To Remove Your Name and Profile Picture from Facebook's Social Ads"

Original Source is #9 on Google

"Transform Your Android Home Screen into a 3D Environment with the SPB Shell 3D Launcher App"

Original Source is #7 on Google

"How to Add a Dislike Button to Your Facebook Page"

Original Source is #14 on Google

The larger implication is that if Google cannot rank the source first when searching for the exact title, then the source will also lose out on traffic from any additional keyword variations that the very same content ends up receiving on scraper and partner sites.

Deconstructing The Panda Damage

Our process has always revolved around human curation with the goal of weeding out anything low quality, it seemed odd that the hit would be so large. We did a deep analysis on a variety of signals (article word count, title word count, how many links, embedded media, how many comments, how many favorites, bounce rate, etc) to try to determine which individual pieces of content were getting hit the most.

We separated the content that gained the most traffic to compare against the content that had lost the most traffic, comparing signals & looking for trends. The results seemed random. Very short video descriptions would rank quite well, while long, detailed original transcriptions and guides were suffering. Every time we thought we'd found an influencing signal, we'd go on to find enough exceptions to negate it.

It became abundantly clear that Panda does not work by filtering out individual low quality content as was originally implied. It works by punishing entire domain names if an undetermined percentage of the content on that site meets the undefined "low-quality" criteria. Soon after we came to this realization, Google confirmed it in a statement to Search Engine Land, and an interview with WIRED.

This Site-Wide Approach Punishes High Quality Results

With this signal hitting an entire site instead of just its individual low quality content, the results fundamentally oppose the stated goal of search quality and fairness in attribution. The collateral damage results in Google burying the original source of high quality content, promoting those who steal, scrape, and republish above them. Furthermore, it ends up demoting other top quality results simply because of the domain on which the content resides. It's counter-intuitive to think that prejudicially branding every piece of a particular site's content, past, present and future is an effective way to promote top quality results.

Trying To Resolve Your Site-Wide Demotion

Within a week, several search analysis reports started popping up with post-mortem break-downs. Most were fundamentally flawed in that they only looked at the number of ranking places each site would loose without taking search quantity and click through rate into account. The bottom line is that the difference between ranking 1st and ranking 2nd is mammoth. As such if your site ranked #1 for a couple hundred popular queries and you got flagged by panda, the bulk of your traffic loss would be from those #1 positions changing to #2 to #10 positions. Shifts between #4-#8 don't make nearly as much of a difference. But I digress.

A consensus has been forming across the web stating that if you remove duplicate and otherwise low-quality content from your site, or do the work of telling Google not to index it, your classification as low-quality under panda would be lifted. The idea that you can get out from under this cloud started to gain traction as a couple of stand out examples started showing up.

Find Your "Problem Content"

The vast majority of content on WonderHowTo was written by our team of editors, researchers, and curators. It has always been our policy to write original descriptions for the videos our curators approve for our library so as to ensure authenticity, accuracy, and relevance. It is part of the added value we bring to the table when embedding how-to videos from youtube, vimeo, or any of the other 17,000 creators we've curated in our hunt for useful and excellent HowTos (Talented video creators often produce an excellent tutorial with zero regard to title or description, rendering them invisible to search. To these compelling voices, we have sent a steady stream of deserved traffic).

Over the years we have also consummated one-off agreements with a handful of partners who requested that we use their own specific descriptions, word-for-word, when including their content on our site. As was the Pre-Panda norm, Google would always rank the original source 1st, so there was no need for any one-off no-index tags to keep rankings in their correct place.

With the growing consensus that such republishing could be a major signal in getting a domain flagged, it seemed apparent that our biggest problem might be this content from our partners. After auditing our library, we found that about 16% of our content had been republished word for word from one of these partners. We would have to noindex these to take them out of search visibility.

Enact Your Sweeping Changes to Remove Your Problem Content

Once you've identified all your problematic content, it's time to noindex it. Digital Inspiration made a number of similar changes and saw his rankings restored within two weeks. Here are the changes we made to WonderHowTo as of March 25, 2011:

1. Duplicate Content from Syndication Partnerships
We added a robots noindex meta tag to each page where content was republished from one of our partners.

2. Related Video Pages
We realized that the pages we have that show all the related videos to a particular video were allowed to be indexed. So, we added a robots noindex meta tag to each of those pages.

3. Un-embeded Video Pages
When we don't embed how-to videos from around the web that we feel meet our quality guidelines for inclusion on our library, we provide a link for people to watch that video on the source site. As people who land on these pages from a google search may find this page to be an intermediary page, we think these may tripping the signal as well. So, we added a robots noindex meta tag to each of those pages.

4. Tag Pages
According to Digital Inspiration, allowing tag pages with inadequate content to be indexed may also trip this flag, so we added a robots noindex meta tag to all topic pages with fewer than 4 useful videos on them.

5. Page Link Count
I read that too many links on a page may have also been a signal. So, we cut the limit of the number of related topics to show on any given page down by 50%.

Wait for your Changes to Take Effect

Within a week, Google had re-crawled enough of our content to start removing the no-indexed pages from the index. We knew this would result in an additional drop in search traffic, but the hope was to rectify the side effect of Google ranking our high-quality content lower than the scrapers who republish it.

We are hopeful that the changes we've made will remove this site-wide flag, or that Google will tweak the algorithm to only target low quality content as opposed to an entire site. But as of today, (4/19/2011), the problem still exists. Google continues to drive people who search for our content to the republished versions on our partners sites and the sites who scrape us without permission or attribution. Our search traffic has declined (now partially because of our noindexing changes), and our high quality content continues to be outranked by less helpful results.

If you have a site that is experiencing a similar phenomenon, let us know in the comments. This behavior seems contrary to the fundamentals of search quality, and Panda specifically. Without making some noise about it, it may never be corrected.


Do you like this post? Yes No

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/EgLukelopGo/postpanda-your-original-content-is-being-outranked-by-scrapers-amp-partners

George Lopez George Lucas Gisele Bundchen Glenn Beck